Really? Then came the press release from the California Secretary of State’s office stating there was no fraud and there will be no prosecutions.
This was no surprise to me, but I didn’t think I would get so lucky as to have the most prominent members of the machine so gullible as to identify themselves as part of the problem. We had given them the opportunity more than once to do the right thing and stop the theft of our elections, but then why would they throw themselves out of office? Of course, they would not – so now it is up to us, you and I, to help them leave as soon as possible, preferably to jail.
The stated goal here in these press releases is to bury the issue and make us go away. Their pronouncements, arrogant at least, were designed to put to rest the concept of voter and registration fraud in the minds of the constituents. While one person claimed that I had given “hints” of evidence, they also said obviously nothing was there. Apparently, that individual could not tell the difference between actual evidence and “hints,” so it’s a good thing that law enforcement is not this person’s employment.
I am reassured that the majority of this county can see the difference between the reality of 101% voter turnout and empty assurances of fair elections by people who have obviously benefitted directly from the problem. This, in fact, is what started the investigation because common sense tells you that there is a problem when there is more than a 100% turnout overall in a given area when the rest of the nation only have a 60% turnout. One precinct had 130% turnout! They can’t all be mistakes, folks!
I saw a woman on television who is a professor at Occidental College who insisted that there is no such thing as voter fraud. She made the point that there might be small instances of registration fraud, but not voter fraud. How silly! “Registration” fraud leads to voter fraud. You should note that Occidental is the school that is refusing to release school records for our president and the attorney involved is one of the attorneys fighting our voter fraud case in court. Why is such a high-powered attorney interested in our little county’s election issues? Is it because, as one local politician said, that we have figured out the framework? Well, we’ve figured out a whole lot more since and, get ready, we are going to tell you what we have and let you decide. Have we uncovered the most far-reaching machine that will be used again next year if we don’t stop it soon?
First you should know, if you don’t already, what the facts are that the decisions that there was no voter fraud in 2008 were based on. We sent 10,000 voter registrations. Of these, 30 were randomly picked for investigation. Is that a reasonable sample? Whether it is or not the results, I believe, show two things that I will explain after I give them to you. Out of the 30 letters sent out to supposed voters to ask them to confirm or deny that this registration was indeed theirs, only four were returned. Four! This would indicate a problem to me, how about you? Of the four, one individual declared that this was their legitimate registration, one was admitted to be fraud and the other two could not be determined as to their legitimacy.
Apparently no one took the time in the year they had the information from us to try to determine why the other 26 requests were not returned. They couldn’t even be bothered to check those two returns to see why they could not figure out whether they were real. So, after a year we have one legitimate vote, one fraudulent vote and two we don’t know about. Is our election process so unimportant to our state and local officials that two votes is what they used to determine whether fraud exists? Or is it that they don’t want to determine whether fraud exists? Isn’t that the most pathetic thing you have ever heard?
I have to also point out the false claim in the Secretary of State’s Election Fraud Unit’s own press release that our D.A. cited that said that 100% of the results did not exhibit voter fraud when they had already admitted to one of the results being fraudulent. Which is it? Dedicated to the truth? What a joke! How can one have confidence in someone who parrots the state’s obvious flawed conclusions? That’s what we apparently have in Santa Barbara County.
The reality is this: At each step of the way in this investigation, we have been cut off by people who for some reason were not willing to face the truth. The judge in the first case stopped the testimony of the first witness as she was trying to tell the court that she did not sign that registration card, did not know who the third-party circulator whose name appeared on the card and had not given someone else her personal information. She was concerned with identity fraud that the card could enable. Identity fraud is a federal felony.
The judge shut the case down and said Steve Pappas didn’t have standing to bring this case. Huh? If he didn’t have standing as a candidate, who would? Then the judge died.
We went to appeal where we were told by the judges that we should pursue this in criminal court, so we did. We went to our sheriff, who conducted an investigation and who then declared there were multiple instances of fraud, and forwarded the package to Sacramento to the same Secretary of State Election Fraud Unit who has just claimed no fraud.
We have been rebuffed at every level by people who benefit from this fraud and by judges and others up for re-election. Is there a theme there? Do we have rampant corruption? Surely not, says local reporters who gleefully report every little defeat. Perhaps they are the mouthpieces, bought and paid for by the machine. After all, our own legal eagle went straight to one of them with a press release before anyone had the courage or decency to tell us about the sudden end to the state’s “investigation.”
Why was that? Looks to me like someone panicked, and I think that was probably the appropriate behavior. Perhaps I would have done the same thing in their position, as they are now in a neat box they cannot extricate themselves from. We have lots of evidence to share with you to see what you think. We have pictures of the most amazing kind, with third-party circulators being hugged by big politicians. We have forms showing who paid whom for perpetrating these frauds. We have already shown the multiple signatures of the head of the Democratic group at UCSB who was rewarded with a job in Washington, D.C. Do you think there might be a long relationship stretching across the country? Is that why one of the third-party circulators got to attend the president’s inauguration?
Do you remember the huge list of colleges and universities that we printed that stretched from Hawai’i to New Hampshire? That came from the Facebook page of one of the third-party circulators, as he bragged how he registered 10,000+ signatures. And then there’s the money trail that goes from SEIU to VERF (which was shut down after the election by the Secretary of State) to local candidates and organizations. Unfortunately, they shut down all the evidence after we had collected it. We have it all in living color.
I believe that this scheme has been going on for a long time, and I think you should know about it and make up your own mind about it. I have relatives who have died to preserve our freedom, and I am sure you do as well. What does it say about us as a people if we allow people to continue to steal our elections? Are we going to stand idly by and watch as our country is stolen out from under us by radicals who hate the very values we cherish? Would you like to have those 99% so called in charge with chaos and destruction being the way of life, and maybe live under Sharia law or someone else’s idea of life? Do you want to be taken back to the Stone Age, where just surviving another day with not enough of anything, food, clothing or shelter is the way one lives? I don’t think so.
As far as I can see, there is one political party that seems to think lying, cheating and stealing from others is OK. Granted, most likely both major parties do it to some extent, but the left-wing Progressive Democrats are much more at ease with it as the Republicans simply don’t have the backbone to stand up to the lawlessness preferred by the Dems to get what they want. Someone told me once that they would never win an election if they didn’t cheat, and maybe that’s true. But it’s time to stop. What do you think?
Camp 4
I understand that the Lompoc City Council was expected to vote on whether to support the fee to trust effort of the casino folk for Camp 4. (See related story on page 3.)I think the Santa Ynez Valley has made it abundantly clear what their position is, and I am not sure why the Lompoc City Council thinks it is in their purview to even address this issue, as it is a county matter and one that is of no legitimate concern of theirs. If they are so enamored of building housing for casino folk, who currently rent out their houses and live in homes and on ranches they have purchased all over the Valley, perhaps Lompoc should find some land for them there and let them deal with a foreign government who couldn’t care less about their surroundings, attract gangs and other people who conduct illicit behavior everywhere they go. We don’t need more of it as it has made life in our Valley much more unpleasant and dangerous.
Recall
I believe recall may be our best bet right now to get rid of the corruption we are dealing with on so many levels. We can mobilize our neighbors and start the process now. It can be done and usually has marvelous results. Stay tuned to more data releases on the voter fraud. We will not stop until it is fixed. Thank you for your overwhelming support! In the meantime, enjoy some of Phil’s pictures from Hawai’i.